

On We March: The 83rd Academy Award Best Original Score Nominees (and Winner)
by Aldrin Calimlim
The King’s Speech, Alexandre Desplat. Oddly, the track titled The King’s Speech in Alexandre Desplat’s splendid score for the Harvey Weinstein-powered, quadruple Oscar-winning The King’s Speech is not the piece played over the climactic scene, where His Majesty King Colin Firth is standing behind an ancient microphone and delivering King George VI’s first wartime speech over the airwaves, replete with dramatic pauses and tricks of elocution prescribed by Lionel Logue as portrayed by Geoffrey Rush, ever a servant of regal films; an adaptation of the second movement of Beethoven’s seventh symphony, renamed Speaking Unto Nations and conducted by Terry Davies, was used for that purpose. Desplat’s The King Speech was appropriated instead for the film’s opening scene, which focuses on the then Prince Albert, Duke of York’s closing speech for an exhibition at a stadium filled with spectators. Initially inviting and imbued with sophisticated whimsy reminiscent of the composer’s brilliant work in Fantastic Mr. Fox (one could just imagine Roald Dahl’s canine character blithely skipping along to the track’s first half), it eventually segues to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows territory with an unsettling near-silence of strings that sound almost like a cry for help coupled with intermittent attempts by a piano at giving solace as poor Bertie in front of his subjects struggles with his bloody stammer. But named as it was after the film, The King’s Speech is not the most memorable of Desplat’s compositions for The King’s Speech. That distinction belongs to The Rehearsal, the elegantly endearing music (audio file for streaming above) accompanying the public speaker and the speech therapist’s rehearsal not for the king’s speech but for the coronation oath. Superbly modulated to evoke the growing bond of (to borrow the compound word of director Tom Hooper) man-love between the two central characters, it’s but one of the many excellent pieces of modern film music from one of the most prolific and most eloquent film composers working today.
Inception, Hans Zimmer. Subtlety has never been Hans Zimmer’s strongest suit. Especially in his recent compositions for Hollywood blockbusters, he’s been one to favor convoluted confluences of musical onomatopoeias over consistently gentle sequences of sounds. Many are averse to Zimmer’s persistent methodical assaults to their auditory canals and, by extension, to their amygdalae (you know, those groups of nerves responsible for emotional reactions, presumably including the ones you feel while watching a film with wall-to-wall music). But this predilection for systematic amplification played to his score’s advantage in Guy Ritchie’s jocular Sherlock Holmes, where strings and percussions banter vigorously amid wild goose chases and bromantic misadventures, and, to a more palpable but altogether humorless extent, in Christopher Nolan’s self-serious Inception, where, as exemplified by Dream Within A Dream, sound waves crash on sound waves crash on sound waves crash on sound waves, some bearing the faintest hints of softness but most others reaching decibels so high that Edith Piaf might have been roused from her grave as though only from a dream.
127 Hours, A. R. Rahman. Kinetic is probably the adjective most commonly used to describe Danny Boyle’s directing style. In telling stories ranging from drug addiction in Trainspotting to childhood innocence in Millions, he refuses to deal with merely talking heads or merely grunting zombies. Motion is what stimulates his mind’s eye. Even when his characters are required to be and remain sedentary, as in the Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? segments of Slumdog Millionaire, Boyle presents them and their surroundings in ways that are anything but static. Even when his central character is stuck in a crevasse with his arm held down by a friggin’ boulder, as in the James Franco vehicle 127 Hours, Boyle is relentless in his signature kineticism, buoyed by, among others, a good part of the scoring efforts of A. R. Rahman, his Academy Award-winning Slumdog collaborator. 127 Hours opens with Free Blood’s fantastic and athletic Never Hear Surf Music Again booming and thumping over a split screen of throngs of people in contrast with Franco as lone canyoneer Aron Ralston just hours before the grueling extent of time of the title. Enjoy the tonal energy of this song while you can, for soon after it is the somewhat forced warmth of Rahman’s The Canyon, which sounds like a cross between a lullaby and the more temperate parts of the Marlboro theme. Beyond that everything else in the soundtrack to Ralston’s Sisyphean task is determinedly pensive, save for a mocking interlude by Bill Withers and his Lovely Day and the trilogy of “liberation” tracks from Rahman. Marked by repetitive and abrasive electric guitar phrases gradually mixed with jubilant orchestral sounds, Liberation Begins, Liberation in a Dream, and the climactic, self-amputative Liberation are perfectly in sync with the kinetic riffs of this gross, yes, but ultimately inspiring nature documentary about the fiercest animal on the planet. Cue Sigur Ros’ hopelandic Festival and Dido and Rahman’s ethereal If I Rise.
How to Train Your Dragon, John Powell. John Powell holds the unenviable distinction of composing the incidental music for two of the worst films of the last decade, The Adventures of Pluto Nash and Gigli. But never you mind that; an awful film can have a not awful score, after all (e.g. James Newton Howard’s for M. Night Shyamalan’s The Village). Most recently Powell banged out the orchestration for DreamWorks’ most ambitious production to date, How to Train Your Dragon, and his work on that film — his sixth for the animation studio — alone exonerates him from any lapse in judgment he might have committed in the past, under the influence of a quick paycheck or otherwise. Alongside his fellow Academy Award nominee, True Grit cinematographer Roger Deakins, who served as visual consultant for directors Chris Sanders and Dean DeBlois, Powell was one of the accomplished professionals hired to help make How to Train Your Dragon what it ultimately hatched into: one of the best animated films in recent memory, even surpassing, some would argue, the achievement of a certain third toy story. His immense contribution to the film cannot be denied. Between This is Berk — its battle horns, warpipes, and muscular male voices introduce the recurring themes of the score as well as the setting and hero of the story — and Coming Back Around — it reflects on the epic journey embarked upon by the hero, a little Viking called Hiccup, and his newfound friend, a dragon he named Toothless, first with a tender hardanger ballad then with a celebration of drum beats and brass zephyrs — Powell turns out two more tracks which are emblematic not only of the spirit of adventure and friendship championed by the film but also of his real, understated talent. Test Drive, whose head and tail are adapted liberally into Coming Back Around, is a sonic representation of Hiccup and Toothless’ maiden flight together. Bisected by a sudden pull-up and free fall of wind and percussion but eventually reclaimed by a triumphant gliding and flapping of the same, it successfully translates and highlights the sense of danger and exhilaration that is at the heart of the rider and the beast’s eye-opening exploits. But it’s one of the few departures from the score’s inclination towards stereoscopic whizbangs that pitches Powell at his most exquisite. In Forbidden Friendship, he builds up an atmosphere of innocence and taking chances with layers upon layers of delicate bars and keys. With the track’s dominant xylophones and subtle shakers, he amplifies the nearly wordless scene where boy and dragon experience their first true physical and emotional contact. It’s an event so magical and improbable that only a climactic divine female chorus conducted by Powell could give it justice. Only the able John Powell, his association with infamous film flops notwithstanding, could.
The Social Network, Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross. After nine pages of an all but one-sided, high-speed conversation between the fictional Mark Zuckerberg and his date, the no less fictional Erica Albright, in the original screenplay for The Social Network, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin introduced Paul Young’s Love of the Common People and suggested it be used as the background music for the film’s post-cold open sequence and Mark’s post-breakup shock and denial. But Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor and frequent collaborator Atticus Ross had a better song in mind to accompany Mark’s bruised ego and the film’s opening credits neatly set in Futura, with corners and edges as sharp as the antihero’s inward pain. It’s aptly called Hand Covers Bruise. Scattered throughout its continuously discordant strings whose nervous oscillations are jarring from the get-go are instances of doleful but more audible piano tritones — ambient dissonance coexisting with but not quite giving in to pulses of rhythm. Like its cousin, the self-descriptively titled penultimate track in the official soundtrack album, The Gentle Hum of Anxiety, it’s a troubled transmission of enlightenment as signal and angst as noise. Its signal-to-noise ratio, then, as in the synthesis of sounds within social networks online and off, is a variable uncertainty. Love of the Common People might have been more pronounced in its acoustic and semantic sarcasm, an effect which would not at all have been undesirable given the film’s powerful undercurrent of irony, but Reznor and Ross’s instrumental Hand Covers Bruise proved the wiser choice. That The Social Network was bookended by it and The Beatles’ Baby, You’re a Rich Man underscores its thematic import.
Time
Hans Zimmer
Inception (2010)
Words by Aldrin Calimlim
Illustration by Rob Cham
I can already imagine the compilers and editors of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die rushing to deliberate which film to boot off their current list to make way for Inception in the book’s next edition. Now this may all sound a bit hyperbolic, but I assure you that my apparently feverish excitement over the film is not at all unfounded. I am most certainly not alone in thinking that Inception is one of the best films, science fiction or otherwise, to come out in years.
I’ve seen it twice, and my mind was no less blown on one occasion than on the other. If anything, the film becomes more and more engaging with every viewing, which, concurrent to answering some or all of the questions that were formed in one’s mind during and after the previous viewing, sprouts even more brain-teasing ones. One wonders if Christopher Nolan had the Penrose infinite staircase, a three-dimensional representation of which appears in the film during a dream (for where else can a three-dimensional version of the object exist?), in that brilliant mind of his all the while he was writing Inception. His is a thinking man’s film that does not only require multiple viewings; it deserves them. His is a story with so much daring and so much cunning that it has managed to set minds abuzz and ablaze with intelligent discussions that run the gamut from the profoundly philosophical to the tremendously technical, in-depth analyses that are, outside of the recently concluded Lost and, to a lesser degree, Harry Potter, unprecedented.

Probably the hottest topic of discussion among those who’ve seen Inception is the now famous final scene, an ending showing the protagonist’s totem or personal indicator of the fidelity of his surroundings, an object that tells him whether he is in a dream or in reality. His object is a stylized top which when spun while in a dream, filled with impossible inertia, doesn’t stop rotating, but when spun in the real world behaves as expected, bowing to the laws of physics and ultimately falls and stops spinning. The debate stems from the fact that just when one thinks Dom Cobb, the protagonist, has finally reached the happy ending he desperately wants and deserves, one sees the scene panning to his totem, slowly revealing it as spinning wildly as though stationary, until it begins to wobble, and then… the scene cuts to black. One groans, then lets out a succession of wows, then claps, then contemplates for an indefinite amount of time this feat of legerdemain of an ending.
The gravity of this final scene is augmented by Hans Zimmer’s excellent piece called Time, which is also the final track in the original motion picture soundtrack album, the composer’s best since, well, last year’s idiosyncratic and playful Sherlock Holmes film score. Like the other tracks in the Inception score, the enigmatically and aptly titled Time is, true to the film’s main narrative device, suggestive of an altered state of consciousness, underscoring the dreamlike quality of the scene it plays over, besides being an amalgam of Paul Oakenfold’s ambience and Michael Giacchino’s breadth. The track also serves as the leitmotif of the film score, lending credence to the film’s obsession with the flow of time and its attendant hopes and illusions.
Time starts off slow as Cobb nods to his colleagues who helped him succeed in his last mission and prepares to make his way home, then it crescendoes in true Hans Zimmer fashion with a rise and fall in intensity, emotional and melodic both, and then suddenly becomes soft and silent, a meditation of the titular abstract concept as Cobb is finally reunited with his family, leading to a final, jarring and vaguely melancholy fall-off that coincides with the aforementioned cut-to-black effect, in turn signifying that the top neither stops spinning nor topples, that at that exact point in time, time itself is rendered irrelevant.
For Cobb, in that moment, there is only the now. It’s his wish to be with what’s left with his once complete and happy family again, to start over. It’s where he has finally found himself in. It is, in a manner of speaking, his dream. But also, in that moment, Cobb realizes he’s finished biding his time. He’s through battling his messed-up memories, simultaneously persistent and volatile. In the end, totem or no continuously spinning totem, it may as well be, for all intents and purposes, his reality. I’ve seen the movie twice, and I could swear that right after the scene is blacked out, there’s the sound of a stylized top tottering and ultimately falling. Like a wizened character said early on in the film, “Who are you to say otherwise?”

528491
by Don Jaucian and Jay Santiago
Inception (2010)
D: Christopher Nolan
C: Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon Levitt, Ellen Page, Michael Caine, Ken Watanabe, Marion Cotillard, Cillian Murphy, Tom Hardy, Dileep Rao, Pete Postlethwaite
While the concept of dreams thwart any explanation, Christopher Nolan’s latest film Inception attempts to explore the human subconscious. There are Michael Bay explosions, folding cityscapes, zero gravity sequences and chases. It’s enough to warrant it a film that will delight many, but it isn’t. The architecture of the dream metropolis is a striking maze with paradoxical complexities. These are representations of reality, but the physics can also be bent at will to suit the needs of the operation. Treading the dream world is a terrible business, with its shifting logic and mechanisms. But to actually penetrate and implant an idea is another thing. And this process is called “inception”.
For its lengthy running time, this film doesn’t waste a single minute. As soon as the first frame fills the screen, we are thrust into the engaging and at times confounding concepts that took Nolan a considerably long development process. The basic premise seems simple enough: a sci-fi heist movie where the vault is the human mind, and the prized payoff is an idea that has been tucked away in the labyrinth of the subconscious—accessible only in the dream state.
To discuss the narrative of Inception would be to divulge many of the secrets that lurk underneath the layers of the film. This might actually be a cloaking device that Nolan uses to disguise the simplicity of the story at hand. But he doesn’t make it easy for us. Explanations are piled over explanations, leaving you no time to absorb the surroundings and the ongoing action. Symbols are scattered throughout: totems (objects that an agent uses to determine whether it’s his dream or not) such as tops and chess pieces, pinwheels and photographs. These objects add an ominous presence, representing the solidity of reality and the ambiguous nature of dreams.
Nolan’s eye for detail is a trait that makes him one of the most engaging auteurs of the blockbuster age, even provoking a shift in superhero franchise films from fluffy spectacles to substantial tour de forces. Indeed, rebooting the Batman franchise was the perfect exercise for handling films of this scale, while Memento and The Prestige now seem like practice runs at mastering conceptual complexity with an elegant aesthetic intact. However, it is in this intricacy that his latest feature both flourishes and flounders. In presenting a piece that relies more heavily on intellect, you may feel a certain emotional disconnection from the events that unfold.
Of course, that’s not to say that this isn’t one of the most engaging big budget films this year, thanks to its gifted cast and richly realized visuals. Chances are, like the two authors who share this review, you will find yourself still reeling from the experience long after you’ve left the theater, continuing to grasp what you’ve just witnesssed. In that respect, this is one film that actually fulfills its promise of planting ideas in the viewers’ minds that slowly take a life of their own. Ideas that foster a collective experience and encourage discussion. Perhaps this was the real dream behind Inception, and for that alone, this is one celluloid dream worthy of dissection.